|
Other
Issues / Archive
NBC
Election Night Coverage
Waxman
Presses NBC on Election-Night Videos
August
6, 2001
Multichannel
News
By
Ted Hearn
Washington--
Claiming NBC has been less than candid, Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.)
is
continuing his fight to force the network to surrender alleged videotapes
from election night last November to determine whether General Electric
Co. chairman and CEO Jack Welch
inappropriately influenced the network's call of the presidential
race.
In a four-page
letter to NBC president and chief operating officer Andrew Lack,
dated last
Thursday, Waxman demanded that NBC turn over the tapes or he would
"be required to seek
other means" of compelling the network's compliance.
Waxman aide
Phil Schiliro said the lawmaker was referring to a congressional
subpoena. If
Congress is in session, the subpoena would have to be issued by
the GOP-controlled House
Subcommittee on Telecommunications and the Internet, said Ken Johnson,
spokesman for House Energy and Commerce Committee chairman Billy
Tauzin (R-La.). Tauzin has the power to issue a recess subpoena.
"We certainly would be interested in seeing anything that Rep.
Waxman uncovers, but chairman Tauzin has no intention of issuing
any subpoenas," Tauzin spokesman Johnson said.
Waxman is willing
to wait for the House to return from its August recess after Labor
Day, Schiliro added.
Waxman is the
second highest-ranking Democrat on the House Energy and Commerce
Committee. He could become the panel's chairman in 2003 if Democrats
gain control of the chamber in the November 2002 election.
If Waxman fails
to obtain NBC's cooperation now, he might be able to issue a subpoena
if he
becomes chairman in 16 months.
Waxman is trying
to hunt down evidence that would support or refute a rumor he heard
that Welch, a prominent Republican, ordered NBC News to call the
presidential race for then-Texas Gov. George W. Bush, the GOP candidate.
The congressman
believes NBC promotional staffers shot videotape on election night
that may have captured Welch's interference with NBC's election
team, which Lack supervised.
GE is the corporate
parent of NBC, which owns the broadcast network, several local TV
stations and such cable networks as CNBC and MSNBC.
Waxman has sent
Lack four letters since February seeking information about the videotapes
because he believes some of the executive's responses have been
evasive.
On July 31,
Lack sent Waxman a letter repeating his view that the Welch rumor
was bogus and that Waxman had provided insufficient grounds for
a news organization to turn over internal videotapes to the government.
Lack -- who
has denied that videotapes showing election-night interference by
Welch exist -- told Waxman that NBC considered the whole inquiry
to be closed.
Lack was president
of NBC News on election night and was elevated to run NBC in May.
NBC spokesman
Cory Shields indicated last Friday that the network was unlikely
to respond to
Waxman's latest letter.
"What we
are going to say is that Andy's letter dated July 31, which is his
most recent letter, speaks for itself," Shields said.
In February,
Lack testified under oath before the House Energy and Commerce Committee
-- which was probing election-night miscues by the major networks
-- that if the videotapes exist, he would provide them to Waxman.
But Lack claimed no knowledge of such tapes and told the committee
the Welch story was a "dopey rumor" that was untrue.
Although Lack
has retreated from his February promise, Waxman is holding him to
it. Moreover, Waxman's latest letter to Lack asserted that "NBC
has confirmed to my office that in fact an
advertising and promotion videotape from election night unquestionably
exists."
Waxman, however,
did not name his NBC source, or disclose whether the tape includes
footage of Welch.
Waxman has given
NBC until Sept. 4 to produce the videotapes. He admonished Lack
that the
destruction or alteration of the videotapes would constitute a federal
crime of obstructing a
congressional investigation.
In his letter,
Waxman complained that Lack has failed to provide straightforward
responses about the videotapes in previous letters. Consequently,
he added, he was unwilling to let the issue die until he has reviewed
the tapes himself.
"This is
especially important when committee witnesses promise -- under oath
-- to supply requested information. So I respectfully decline to
close this matter," Waxman said.
He added that
he was "offended" by Lack's position and called NBC's
decision to declare the
matter dead an "arrogant assertion." Lack and Waxman disagree
on whether Congress is entitled to see the videotapes.
Lack indicated
the tapes had First Amendment protection, but Waxman said no such
protection applied since they were evidently related to NBC's advertising
and promotional efforts.
|